{{first_name | Hey}}, welcome back.
Three launches, five days. On the 23rd a San Francisco studio launched a product that does not exist. On the 24th Parallax announced $117m for gas turbines. On the 28th Wajo launched a personal AI agent that says it ran and paid for its own launch video. The two that used the launch as the demo won.
A studio that sells launch films shipped one for a product nobody can buy. Seven days on, Max Musgrave's Sidehoe film had 4,668,836 views and 6,384 bookmarks.
Fifteen seconds into Wajo's launch film, founder Shivani Poddar leaves and the agent presents most of the rest. It says it hired four crew members, flew them in and booked their hotels on its own credit card. In two days that post took 4,934 bookmarks.
Parallax's page is a splash page NOOON Studio built for the raise. Its one link to another page is the Journal story, swapped in during a call with the studio, share-button tracking still attached. Six days in, the post had 632 bookmarks.
The ad that was the product
On the 23rd, Musgrave posted a launch film for Sidehoe, an AI assistant for managing several people you date. The product does not exist and was never meant to. The page the film sends viewers to says it outright: "Sidehoe isn't real. The launch video was."
Musgrave runs Strive Haus, a San Francisco studio that sells launch films, and its site advertises videos that "average 250K+ views." The studio shipped its own demo as a live launch and let the counters answer for it. That is 4,668,836 views against the 250K+ average on its own site, for a product that cannot be bought.
The launch that handed itself over
Wajo founder Shivani Poddar opens her 154-second launch film with "I'm Shivani, and today I'm excited to introduce you to" and gets no further. "Oh shit, I forgot. I have a lunch date, guys. I have to go." The agent answers: "That's okay. I've got a table booked and a car coming to pick you up in five minutes." Fifteen seconds in, she leaves her own launch. "Thanks, you're a lifesaver. You can take it from here."
Fo presents the next hundred seconds or so itself. "Let's start with this launch video. I hired four crew members, flew them in, and booked their hotels and Ubers," it says, "all paid on my own credit card." The asset you are watching is offered as the case study.
It says it is calling five plumbers to compare quotes, and two hang up on it on camera. A trained human executive assistant makes the next call and books the job for 12:30 the following day. Then a task nobody asked for: "I noticed your gym charged you again this morning, so I went ahead and canceled the duplicate membership." Poddar answers, "I've been meaning to do that for a year now." Fo says, "I know."
Poddar returns for the last thirty seconds: "For most of the last decade, this kind of hands-on help was something only the world's billionaires could afford.
Same reach, opposite result
Fo and Parallax landed on almost the same views, 2,868,160 against 2,859,143. Fo got there in two days against Parallax's six, with 4,934 bookmarks to Parallax's 632. The post with the product working inside it is the one people saved.
We ran the same split in September. Farza Majeed had that audience behind an earlier product, Tidbit, and it went nowhere. HeyClicky's launch clip took 3 million views off a silent screen capture where the value read in about three seconds, a cursor pointing at a button. Everything he has posted about the product since has passed 15 million. Same audience both times. What moved was whether a viewer could see the thing work.
We read a bookmark as the counter nearest to intent, somebody planning to return. Fo and Sidehoe each beat Parallax on all six counters.
Fo's pickup came from smaller trade sites like Startup Fortune. Site searches for "Fo" and "Wajo" on TechCrunch, run 30 September, returned nothing. Fo still took the best save rate of the three. Press pickup and buyer intent are different scoreboards, so report them apart.
Atoms showed the other version of this in July. Travis Kalanick announced $1.7b, took 2.5 million views on the post, then ten minutes later asked for hiring tips and dropped the careers link. The raise announcement was recruiting at the same time. Parallax's page gives a reader one link and it goes to the Journal.
What a splash page costs
Publishing almost nothing of your own is the better option, and Parallax took it. Somebody else then writes your positioning. parallax.ai says four words about what the company is, "THE AI ENERGY COMPANY," unchanged between 28 and 30 September. Founder and CEO Carl Schoeller gets two quotes in the Journal, four sentences between them. The technical case for the company sits on Eclipse's blog, published by an investor on announcement day. A buyer who wants to know what Parallax builds has to leave its domain to find out.
The one asset you kept then gets less care than the one you skipped. The page's single outbound link is labeled "Read More." It still carries "reflink=article_copyURL_share," the parameter a share button appends, so what a $117m company published is the URL a share button hands you, tracking and all. NOOON Studio describes walking the team through a Framer setting so they could swap a placeholder link for the Journal story. A splash page gives a buyer almost nothing to click, so the one link it does carry gets read closely.
If you run this play, write the sentence you want quoted and put it on your own domain before the coverage lands. Reporters will use it. If it is not there, they will use whatever your investor published.
3 plays you can run on your next launch
Build the proof out of the pitch: Strive Haus sells launch films and shipped one for a product that does not exist. Wajo sells an errand-running agent and handed it the launch. Both launches are the product working. Find the part of your own launch your product could produce, then hand it over on camera.
Put the failure on camera: Two plumbers hang up on Fo inside its own launch film before a human assistant books the job. The loss is what makes the human backstop land as a feature a buyer can test. A competitor cannot answer it without staging a failure of its own. Find the moment your product loses, then show who picks it up.
Take the save rate to the board: Parallax and Fo sit 7.8 times apart on bookmarks per thousand. A view count compares badly across launches of different ages. Report the save rate against your own last three.
The risk to plan for
Seconds after it introduces itself, Fo says: "I have my own phone, credit card, and I'm 100% secure. Unlike other agents, you don't have to worry about me leaking any sensitive information you tell me." Gen Digital's Agent Trust Hub read Wajo's published policies and posted an F, 25 out of 100, its highest risk band. The Hub grades documents and says it "uses AI and may make mistakes," so the grade is arguable. A flat 100% said on camera is a sentence a grader can test against your policy pages. Say on camera only what those pages can defend.
One for the pre-launch checklist
Progressive Robot pulled three figures out of Fo's launch post and checked them against the source, which is the job. The research Wajo published two days earlier does carry the 94% trust rate. The version read on 30 September never prints the "4x less likely to leak private info vs Muse, Instinct" claim, and of those two rivals it says: "We did not measure Muse and Instinct quantitatively, because they offer no way to do so. Their place in the chart is our judgment, not a result."
Have somebody who did not write the copy run that check before you ship. The prompt below does it. World Labs skipped that check in September. Implicator.ai went looking for the paper, arXiv entry, model card and code behind the Atlas launch and found none of the four. The story moved from what Atlas could do to whether its claims held.
Tool used
X prints a bookmark count under every public post, yours and your rivals', no tool or access needed. Pull bookmarks and views for your last three launches. Bookmarks per thousand views gives you the baseline play 3 asks for.
Strive Haus makes launch films. Projects run from $10,000 to $80,000 and up, or retainers starting at $10,000 a month. Before signing at that level, ask the agency to show you a cut where the product did the demonstrating, the way Sidehoe did.
Agent Trust Hub from Gen Digital reads an app's published privacy policy and terms and posts a public letter grade. Lookups are free and nobody opts in, so a grade for you may already be live. Check yours, then the two competitors a buyer would put you next to.
Framer is where the Parallax page was built, going by NOOON Studio's account. Published site plans run free, $10 and $30 a month. Open your own launch page and find out who can change a link on it without booking a call with an agency.
Your launch is three weeks out. What carries it?
Steal this prompt
Point it at a competitor's launch before you plan your own. It asks what their launch asset did, what it conceded, and what it converted.
You are a launch analyst. I am the CMO.
MATERIAL: [the launch post, film or thread, the company's own pages as they looked on launch day, and any coverage I have collected, each with its capture date] LAUNCH DAY: [the date and the timezone. Give every timestamp in UTC] OUR CONTEXT: [what we are launching, our date, what we have budgeted for the launch asset, who owns it, and the metrics we already track with their current values]Get more such prompts in the Prompting Playbook (free for you)
Resource of the week
The Art of Explanation by Ros Atkins of BBC News. Atkins builds every explainer by naming the one thing an audience must understand first. Parallax's own page names four words. Write yours before launch day, not after.
Other Interesting Launches
PS. Did you see our AI Tools Directory? It’s a curated collection of 250+ useful AI tools for your profession, business domain, or specific use cases.
Stay curious, {{first_name | readers}}
